[Portaudio] Artifacts at 384 kHz sampling rate
sbanisetty at iem.net
Tue Dec 1 17:05:16 EST 2015
I tried using WAVELAB as you suggested and I found the same results. Every consecutive sample is repeating. So, is the device duplication the 192 kHz stream?
850 River Street
Troy NY 12180
(518) 268-1636 EXT: 153
This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only to the benefit of the sender, and may be
an attorney-client communication. Therefore, it may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and any
disclosure, copying, or further distribution or use thereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this message in error, please advise by return e-mail and delete/destroy it. Also, advise if
your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
(c) Copyright IEM Corporation 2015
From: portaudio-bounces at lists.columbia.edu [mailto:portaudio-bounces at lists.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Ross Bencina
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 8:12 PM
To: portaudio at lists.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Portaudio] Artifacts at 384 kHz sampling rate
Have you confirmed that you can capture the audio data correctly in another application (e.g. wavelab)?
The obvious answer is that the device is just duplicating the 192kHz stream. Another possibility is that you're capturing stereo but interpreting it as mono, but from your description that seems less likely.
On 1/12/2015 3:04 AM, Santosh Banisetty wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am working with a 32 bit/384 kHz audio recording device called
> Joplin MK II. I am using ASIO and I want to record at 384 kHz.
> When my sampling rate is 384 kHz, the reconstructed sinewave is little
> weird as shown below. Every consecutive sample has the same value as
> the previous sample.
> When the sampling rate is 192 kHz, I see a well re-constructed
> sinewave as shown below. Every sample has a different value.
> So, my question is why am I not able to properly re-construct the
> input sinewave when my sampling rate is 384 kHz?
> Thank you.
Portaudio mailing list
Portaudio at lists.columbia.edu
More information about the Portaudio